EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF WELDING PARAMETERS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GMAW BUTT-WELDED PIPE JOINTS

  • Bui Khac Khanh Hung Yen University of Technology and Education
  • Than Van The Hung Yen University of Technology and Education
  • Nguyen Thanh Phu Hung Yen University of Technology and Education
  • Nguyen Danh Dao Hung Yen University of Technology and Education
  • Ngo Thi Thao Hung Yen University of Technology and Education

Abstract

Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) is widely used in manufacturing due to its high productivity and versatility. However, the quality of butt-welded pipe joints strongly depends on the selection of welding parameters. This study investigates the influence of welding current, voltage, and travel speed on the tensile strength, hardness, and chemical composition of S235JR pipe joints welded with GM-70S filler wire. Experiments were designed using the Taguchi method with an orthogonal array of nine tests. Tensile test results indicated that the welding condition M7 (100A, 20V, 4.6mm/s) achieved the maximum tensile strength of 454 MPa. Hardness measurements indicated the metal zone achieved higher values than other regions. Chemical analysis revealed that changes in Mn and C content correlated with hardness and tensile strength. Overall, the Taguchi method proved effective for optimizing welding parameters, minimizing defects, and improving the reliability of butt-welded pipe joints in industrial applications

References

P. Kah, Advancements in Intelligent Gas Metal Arc Welding Systems: Fundamentals and Applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Radarweg, 2019, 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE.

T.-T. Ngo, C.-C. Wang, J. H. Huang, and V.-T. Than, “Estimating heat generation and welding temperature for gas metal arc welding process,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 2019, vol. 160, 114056.

M. Urzynicok, K. Kwieciński, M. Szubryt, and J. Słania, “Application of new GMAW welding methods used in prefabrication of P92 (X10CrWMoVNb9-2) pipe butt welds,” Materials for Advanced Power Engineering, 2010, pp 532-542.

S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

I. A. Ibrahim, S. A. Mohamat, A. Amir, and A. Ghalib, “The effect of Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) processes on different welding parameters,” Procedia Engineering, 2012, vol. 41, pp. 1502–1506.

M. Ramarao, M. F. L. King, A. Sivakumar, V. Manikandan, M. Vijayakumar, and R. Subbiah, “Optimizing GMAW parameters to achieve high impact strength of the dissimilar weld joints using Taguchi approach,” Mater. Today: Proc., 2022, vol. 50, pp. 861–866.

G. Taguchi, Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes. Tokyo, Japan: Asian Productivity Organization, 1986.

A. Kuppusamy, K. Rameshkumar, A. Sumesh and S. Premkumar, “Gas metal arc welding process parameter optimization to reduce porosity defect in a longitudinal seam welding of pressure vessels,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., Jan. 2020, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 61.

EN 10217-2, Welded steel tubes for pressure purposes – Technical delivery conditions – Part 2: Electric welded non-alloy and alloy steel tubes with specified elevated temperature properties.

AWS A5.18 / ASME SFA-5.18, Specification for Carbon Steel Electrodes and Rods for Gas Shielded Arc Welding.

AWS, Welding Handbook – Volume 2: Welding Processes. Miami, FL, USA: American Welding Society, 2004.

Published
2025-09-24